A grumpy point. A good point.
Josh Oakhurst has something to say on his blog about Four Eyed Monsters and I must say I agree with it. I won’t steal his rant so head over there and read what he has to say. He also has a recommendation for a great web series called The West Side. It looks pretty interesting and seems to be the antithesis of what the FEM kids are doing.
OK so here are my own thoughts on Four Eyed Monsters. BTW if you don’t know about this film and the story behind it, then just do a google search. There has been so much press written on it that there is really no point in me trying to rehash it.
Maybe it was out of charity. Or maybe a feeling of solidarity with fellow struggling filmmakers. Or maybe its because if we can game the system to make their film some money, then that option will be there for me in the future. For any one of these reasons I went to the website i was told to and signed up for their service I will never use. Just so this service would give another dollar to the FEM “pay our credit card bills” fund. I guess as of today (7/07/2007) they are up to $33,000.
As usual, with stuff like this I am very much “Love It” and “Hate It” all at once. And here’s why:
I love that the creators of FEM have found a way to get their money back. Supposedly they have spent $100,000 on this film, all credit card debt. I predict they will get to about fifty grand and then this approach will dry up. Either everyone who was going to sign up for this will have done it, or Spout will realize they are getting nothing out of it and try to change the deal. And they are going to get nothing out of it. I don’t know what Spout is. Some kind of online film community. Like there aren’t enough of those. I don’t care. I haven’t been back to it since I signed up. This is a classic dot.com-style pissing away of money. But if a filmmaker can profit from it, then cool. More power to them. Perhaps as the second internet bubble gets larger, more filmmakers will be able to make out as well.
After signing up for Spout I watched Four Eyed Monsters. Or rather I watch pieces of it. I really couldn’t finish it. I’m not saying its bad. I’m just saying it didn’t interest me. Maybe in the future I will try again. I think maybe if I had it on DVD and could just put it on play while I went about my day, then I could digest it a bit better. But I was getting bored as hell watching it on my computer. I wanted to move on to other things.
I wonder if that will be a continued problem for internet distribution. It’s hard to watch a feature film on a computer. Not because you aren’t interested or don’t have the attention span like some folk like to say. It’s because you can’t do anything else on your computer while you’re watching it. Well you can, but its not the same as have a movie playing on TV while you do whatever dark naughty things you do online. The new set-top boxes everyone is working on is probably the best option. You can still distribute online, but then the content would go to your tv where it belongs.
OK back to the film… One last thing. This film should not cost $100,000. I am totally at a loss to where all that money went, but it’s not on screen. I’ll have to see if I can find a rundown of what the money was spent on, but all things considered, the film appears like it could have been made for a tenth of that sum.
Well enough player hatin’. I wish them well. I’m sure that Arin and Susan are lovely people and I did my part to try and get them out of the hole. Maybe someday they’ll do the same for me.